Scratchpad

If you are new to Scratchpad, and want full access as a Scratchpad editor, create an account!
If you already have an account, log in and have fun!!

READ MORE

Scratchpad
Advertisement

To restate the above nutshell: Redirects are cheap. Redirects take up minimal disk space. Redirects use very little bandwidth. Thus, it doesn’t really hurt things if there are a few of them scattered around. In fact, a redirect page may even avoid the creation of duplicate articles on the same subject, and thereby actually save data space.

  1. Deleting a redirect actually adds very slightly to the size of the database (since deleted pages are not really purged from the database, just hidden from public view). Unless a redirect is actively misleading or gets in the way of a pagemove, there is little point in deleting it.
  2. However, this does not mean we should preemptively create redirects for their own sake. (See Help:Redirect for more.)
  3. On the other hand, cross-namespace redirects make processing Scratchpad content more complex for bots and scripts.
  4. Creating redirects from existing articles can be valid alternatives to pursuing deletion discussions, saving discussion time where a redirect is a legitimate and likely outcome. Consensus should still be sought via discussion (or the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, for less contentious topics).

Notes

Wikipedia This page uses content from Wikipedia. The original article was at Wikipedia:Redirects are cheap.
The list of authors can be seen in the page history.
As with Scratchpad, the text of Wikipedia is available under the Creative Commons Licence.

See also

Advertisement