History Journal Response Times

This is a wiki to discuss journal response times. Please enter details of how many weeks/months between submission, acknowledgment, decision (acceptance, R & R, rejection). If possible please also add the date (month/year); some journals change a lot over time, or with different editors in control. If a journal you have submitted to is not listed, please add it.

Attention users: there have been a couple of incidents of half the page being (inadvertantly I hope) deleted with edits. I don't know if this is a glitch with this page. For this reason, I undid the previous edit (apologies to that user, but everything below the Journal of Women's History had been wiped!). So please check carefully when you edit that no entries are removed. (Feb 11, 2010)

Ambix
 * 4 months (acceptance)

American Historical Review
 * 3 weeks (rejection); 10 weeks (rejection)
 * 1 week (rejection with brief report) (2010)

'''American Quarterly
 * 10 months (rejection)

Annals of science
 * 4 months (acceptance)

Australian Historical Studies
 * 2 months (rejection) (8/2010)

British Journal for the History of Science
 * 2 1/2 months (r & r), after resubmit another 2 months (acceptance)
 * 4 months (acceptance with minor revisions)
 * 9 months (acceptance with revisions)

Bulletin for the History of Medicine
 * 4 months (revise and resubmit); 3 weeks (acceptance)

Comparative Studies in Society and History

Contemporary British History
 * 11 months (acceptance)
 * 12+ months (withdrew article & published elsewhere)

Diplomatic History
 * 3 months (acceptance with minor revisions, revisions accepted 6 days after being returned)

East/West Connections
 * 3 months (R&R)

Endeavour
 * 5 weeks (acceptance with minor revisions, revisions accepted 1 day after being returned) [09/2010]

English Historical Review
 * 1 year (rejection); 9 months (acceptance); 11 months (rejection); 12 months (rejection)
 * 15 months and still waiting (new referees found after 12 months) (11/2009) - I'm at 11 months and waiting. I'm a little tired of it - should I contact them to find out what the hold up is?  This is pretty unacceptable - I'm trying to get a career going here and I don't have a year to wait around for this journal to bother to respond to me.
 * Finally rejected after 19 months
 * 11 months (rejection) To the above comment: send a short but polite e-mail to the editor requesting a progress update. It worked for me.
 * 7 months (rejection) - a polite email asking about progress also worked for me 2010.

Environmental History
 * 2 months (rejection)

Gender and History
 * 2 months (R&R)
 * 5 months (R&R); then 2 months (acceptance)

History
 * 1 month (acceptance)
 * 5 weeks (acceptance) (10/2007)
 * 6 weeks (acceptance) (2008)

History of Education
 * 2 months (R&R) (8/2010)

History of Science
 * 5 months (R&R), followed by 6 months (acceptance) (9/2010)

Historical Journal
 * 9 months (acceptance); 3 months (rejection); 3 weeks (R&R)
 * 4 weeks (editor's rejection - no reviews), (6/2010)

Historical Research
 * 2 months (rejection)
 * 2 months (acceptance) (03/2008)

History Workshop Journal
 * 7 months (rejection)
 * 2 months (rejection) (6/2009)
 * 1 month (acceptance)(6/2009)
 * 6 months (rejection) (9/2010)

Hispanic American Historical Review

International Journal of African Historical Studies
 * 8 months and still waiting

Journal of African History
 * 18 months (chose to withdraw without decision made)
 * 7 months (editor didn't even send off for peer review, choose to decline it himself. Article subsequently published in similar top tier journal. Be ware of this journal with this editor. Seems to have an agenda).

Journal of American History
 * 3 1/2 months (revise & resubmit); 4 months (acceptance)

Journal of British Studies
 * 6 months (R&R), then 1 month after resubmit (acceptance); 3 months (acceptance)
 * 2 months (rejection)

Journal of Canadian History
 * 4 months (R&R), then 4 months after resubmit (acceptance)

Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History
 * 3 months (R&R); 8 months after resubmit, still waiting
 * <1 week (desk rejection); editor v. unfriendly. (2010)
 * 4 months (acceptance); then 4 months later Editor decides not to accept it. Very unprofessional.

Journal of Contemporary History
 * 5 months (R&R) (9/2009)

Journal of Historical Biography
 * 4 months (rejection) (10/2009)

Journal of the History of Medicine & Allied Sciences
 * 4 months (revise and resubmit); resubmit accepted in under 24 hours, and online in <3 months

'''Journal of the History of Sexuality
 * 7 months (acceptance) (2008)
 * 10 months (revise and resubmit); 2 months (acceptance)

Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History
 * 6 months (revise and resubmit); 2 months (acceptance). Went to proofs right away for the next issue.

Journal of Medieval History
 * Under 3 months (acceptance)
 * 1 month (acceptance) 2010

Journal of Military History
 * 7 months (rejection) (11/2010)

Journal of Modern History
 * 7 months (acceptance)
 * 3 weeks (desk rejection) (3/2010)
 * 2 months (R&R)

Journal of Social History
 * 3 1/2 months (rejection)
 * 1 month (acceptance without revision)
 * 3 months (rejection) (6/2010)
 * 5 months (rejection); 3 weeks (revision accepted) (2009)

Journal of Southern History
 * 4 months (R&R) - then, two weeks after resubmit (acceptance - it doesn't appear to have gone back to the readers)

Journal of Urban History
 * 6 months (acceptance) (2007)

Journal of Women's History
 * 4 weeks (rejection)

Journal of World History
 * 7 weeks (acceptance) (3/2010)

Law and History Review
 * 4 1/2 months (revise and resubmit)
 * 2009: 4 months (revise and resubmit); 2 weeks for acceptance of resubmitted piece. 12 months to publication from acceptance.

Literature & History

Medical History
 * 3 months (rejection)
 * 3 months (revise & resubmit); 1 month (revision accepted); predicted 12 months to paper publication.
 * 2 1/2 months (revise & resubmit); 2 weeks (acceptance); 4 months later it was in print.

Mediaeval Studies
 * 5 months (R&R) 2010

Modern Asian Studies

Modernism/Modernity
 * 3 months (desk rejection after initial email had said piece had 'entered the review process')

Notes and Queries
 * 8 months (acceptance) (1/2009)

Notes and records of the Royal Society
 * 3 months (R&R), followed by 3 months (acceptance)

New Mexico Historical Review
 * 3 months (R&R)

Pacific Historical Review
 * 3 months (Revise and Resubmit)

Past and Present
 * 7 months (R&R) then 3 months (acceptance)
 * 7 months (R&R) then 4 months (acceptance) (5/2010)
 * Incredibly slow replying to the editorial email address (2010)
 * 5 months (rejection) [2011]

positions: east asia cultures critique

Rethinking History

 Sixteenth Century Journal
 * 6 months (acceptance) 2007
 * 3 months (R&R); 2 months (minor revisions); 6 weeks (acceptance) - September 2010

Speculum
 * 16 months (oddly worded R&R; chose not to resubmit)

Social History of Medicine
 * 3 months (revise and resubmit); then 9 months to online publication [2009]
 * 3 months (revise and resubmit); 1 month (acceptance); 18 months later I have only just completed proofing stage.

Technology and culture
 * 7 months (R&R) followed by 3 months (acceptance)

Twentieth Century British History
 * 4 months (rejection)
 * 6 weeks (rejection: no reports) [09/2010]
 * 2 months (rejection) (summer 2010)

Urban History

War and Society
 * 5 months (acceptance) 2009-10

War in History
 * 1 month (R&R) then 3 months (acceptance) (11/2009)
 * 9 months (R&R) then 2 months (acceptance), apparently unusual delay because reviewer failed to submit report (submitted May 2006, accepted June 2007, published April 2008)

Women's History Review (incidentally, the friendliest editor I have *ever* dealt with - a pleasure! Jan 2010.)
 * 3 months (R&R); 6 weeks (Minor revisions); estimated 12-14 months from final acc. to pub. [2008-9]

William & Mary Quarterly
 * 1 month (desk rejection)